Ga naar de startpagina
Zoek leermateriaalKennis & expertiseCommunities
NL|EN
Privacy policyDeelnemende instellingen
Creative CommonsCreative Commons AttributionSURFFunded by the European Union

Filteren

Zoekresultaten (27)

HBO/WO

MBO

1 april 2017

Searchlight Reference step 5: Make your selection

Part of Searchlight Reference (belonging to the online course 'Searchlight') about all aspects of information literacy. This part is step 5: Making a selection.

Website

Bibliotheek HvA

2 september 2023

Evaluating information & data: Verify credibility non-academic online sources

Verifying credibility non-academic online sources The credibility of the author is very important in determining the quality of a source. Academic publications have their own quality check for authors: in general only scholars active in academia are allowed to publish. And even then only in their own, or a closely related field. Non-academic sources on the other hand lack this quality check: anyone can write anything about everything, especially online. Exercise Credibility: who is the author? Exercise What is the credibility of the author? Related.

Website

Erasmus University Library

2 september 2023

Evaluating information & data: Evaluate non-academic sources

Evaluating non-academic sources Non-academic sources are very valuable for scholarly research, especially in the humanities and social sciences. The challenge in using them lies in the fact that they haven’t gone through a more-or-less fixed process of quality checking before they become available, as is the case with scholarly sources (i.e. academic publications). Exercise Original source or not?

Website

Erasmus University Library

30 juni 2023

Search methods & techniques: Google vs library resources?

Should I be using Google or the library resources? Unfortunately, it’s not simply a matter of choosing one or the other. Internet search engines like Google can search billions of public web pages for your keywords in seconds, but they cannot access proprietary data. Google vs PsycINFO Why do you have to use an academic database, like Scopus or PsycINFO? Is Google Scholar, a simple way to broadly search for scholarly literature, not enough? To let you experience the differences between Google Scholar and academic database, an example. Related.

Website

Erasmus University Library

21 maart 2024

Information literacy framework

The Information Literacy Framework formulates learning outcomes, developed by HAN study centres. When is someone "information literate" and what training is needed at various levels to acquire the relevant skills? Three levels are distinguished A Basic (general) B Advanced (task-oriented) C Final (graduation phase/practice-based research). The stated learning outcomes were tested using the Tuning Guide. A Dutch version is available. The title is: 'Raamwerk Informatievaardigheden'.

Document

Bibliotheek Hogeschool Arnhem Nijmegen

23 augustus 2023

Lecture: Duty Ethics

Learner can assess choices on what subjects are ought to do. Learner understands the concept of moral. Learner has basic understanding of how those points relate to AI.

Website

HCAIM Consortium

15 juli 2024

Evaluating sources at a surface level

In this module you will learn to describe which criteria should be used when evaluating a source, and recognise different tools to evaluate source quality.

Website

Maastricht University Library

27 november 2024

Libguide Wikipedia

Wikipedia is an online encyclopedic reference work, which is mainly useful for a first orientation on a topic. In this LibGuide you will find information about using Wikipedia for scholarly purposes.

Website

Universiteitsbibliotheek Utrecht

1 september 2023

Rubrics minor Science, Technology & Innovation: Biomimicry

The rubric for the final report in the UvA's ST&I: Biomimicry minor is designed to assess students' ability to communicate their project findings effectively, integrating technical and scientific research with biomimicry principles. It emphasizes layout, scientific grounding, prototype development, testing accuracy, and comprehensive documentation, aiming to ensure clarity, depth, and professionalism in student reports. This detailed evaluation framework aligns with the program's interdisciplinary and innovative ethos, preparing students for real-world challenges while fostering academic rigor and creativity.

Document

Morten Stromme

8 mei 2025

Checklist assessing GenAI content

Since commonly used evaluation criteria—such as a well-known author or reputable organization—often do not apply to GenAI-generated content, this type of content requires different and additional points of attention. For this reason, a checklist has been developed specifically for higher education to help assess the quality and reliability of texts generated by generative AI. This checklist can be adapted to institution-specific needs; the repository includes versions tailored to institutions such as the Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (HvA) and the University of Amsterdam (UvA). The questions and follow-up checks are structured step by step to support users in critically evaluating aspects such as relevance, source referencing, factual accuracy, objectivity, and the inclusion of multiple perspectives. Both a printable version and an interactive online version are available. This allows each user to apply the checklist in a way that best suits their educational or research context. Please note: the interactive features—such as per-section checklists and explanatory tooltips for “fact-checking” and “checking perspectives” (visible on hover)— will only work if the checklist is first downloaded and opened in Adobe (Acrobat). Dutch-language versions can be found by searching for “Checklist beoordelen GenAI content".

Document

Harrie van der Meer