Ga naar de startpagina
Zoek leermateriaalKennis & expertiseCommunities
NL|EN
Privacy policyDeelnemende instellingen
Creative CommonsCreative Commons AttributionSURFFunded by the European Union

Filteren

Zoekresultaten (64)

…

HBO/WO

MBO

12 mei 2026

[ENG] Pressure cooker Transdisciplinarity – A theoretical approach

What – This pressure cooker is an introduction to the theory of the why and what transdisciplinary education. You’ll learn why transdisciplinary education can be useful and what it means. For whom – The format can be used (and adjusted) for a class of students (all levels; any group size) as well as a team of educational developers or teachers. Why – Guided training in, for instance, transdisciplinary education improves the actual working with, or teaching of, it. How long – In-class activities take under one hour. Preparation at home takes up to 40 minutes. Our practical approach (the how), which you can take after this pressure cookers takes op two hours.

Presentatie

Anke Swanenberg, Yvette Baggen, Programma Interdisciplinair Onderwijs

20 april 2026

Theme - international exchange

In this theme, you will practice speaking English in the context of preparing for an international exchange project.

HboDocument

Amy Klipp, Honorine de Keijzer-Davies, Jasmin Back, Noortje Cras

16 april 2026

High Sensitivity: Brain, Mental Health and Society | Radboud Reflects Lecture with Corina Greven and Judith Homberg

What is High Sensitivity? An estimated 1 in 5 people identify as highly sensitive. Is there an increase? What happens in the brain of a highly sensitive person? How does high sensitivity affect mental health? And if there’s an increase, what does that say about our society? Learn from psychologist Corina Greven and neuroscientist Judith Homberg, and learn more about high sensitivity, the brain and society. High Sensitivity: Brain, Mental Health and Society | Lecture and conversation with psychologist Corina Greven and neuroscientist Judith Homberg | Thursday, 16 April 2026 | 20.00 - 21.30 hrs | Lecture Hall Complex, Radboud University | Radboud Reflects and Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour Have a look at the recap: ++www.ru.nl/en/services/sport-cu…ntist-judith-homberg++

Audio

Corina Greven, Judith Homberg

8 april 2026

ACA-bot

ACA-bot is an engaging chatbot designed for Automated Conversational Assessment (ACA). Drawing inspiration from traditional oral exams, this text-based conversational agent transforms assessment into a dynamic learning experience. It supports both formative and summative evaluation by offering students personalised feedback and guidance at every step of their learning journey. The first ACA-bot prototype focuses on assessing students’ understanding of basic statistical concepts, but its flexible design allows for easy adaptation to a wide range of subjects and learning contexts. Through interactive dialogue, students can practise explaining ideas clearly under exam-like conditions, apply their knowledge to new and challenging questions, and refine their reasoning as they respond to follow-up prompts. They gain valuable insights into their own understanding, identify areas for improvement, and gradually build confidence for both oral and written assessments. For educators, ACA-bot offers a powerful way to scale oral examinations and enhance formative assessment without increasing workload. It automates parts of the assessment process, provides structured and actionable insights into student performance, and opens the door to more personal, interactive feedback at scale. By combining the strengths of conversational AI and educational assessment, ACA-bot turns evaluation into a collaborative, insightful process. It empowers students to think aloud, reason more effectively, and grow, while giving educators a smarter, more innovative way to understand and support learning. ACA-bot is een slimme en inspirerende chatbot die onderwijs en Artificial Intelligence samenbrengt. Geïnspireerd door het klassieke mondelinge examen tilt deze tekstgebaseerde gespreksagent Automated Conversational Assessment naar een nieuw niveau. Studenten krijgen via natuurlijke gesprekken directe, persoonlijke feedback en begeleiding, waardoor leren en toetsen samenvloeien in één boeiende ervaring. Het prototype van ACA-bot is ontwikkeld om kennis over statistiek te beoordelen, maar dankzij het flexibele ontwerp kan het systeem eenvoudig worden aangepast aan andere vakgebieden en toepassingen. Tijdens interactieve dialogen leren studenten helder uitleg geven, hun kennis toepassen op nieuwe vragen en hun redenering aanscherpen. Ze ontdekken waar hun begrip nog verdiept kan worden en groeien zichtbaar in zelfvertrouwen — waardevolle voorbereiding op zowel mondelinge als schriftelijke examens. Ook voor docenten biedt ACA-bot een slimme oplossing. Het maakt mondelinge toetsing schaalbaar, ondersteunt formatieve beoordeling via gesprek, en vermindert de werkdruk door delen van het beoordelingsproces te automatiseren. Bovendien geeft het gestructureerde inzichten in de voortgang en denkwijze van studenten, waardoor elke dialoog bijdraagt aan beter onderwijs. ACA-bot laat zien hoe Automated Conversational Assessment het leren persoonlijker, interactiever en effectiever maakt. Studenten denken hardop, verkennen hun eigen begrip, en verbeteren met vertrouwen — terwijl docenten op een innovatieve, datagedreven manier inzicht krijgen in hoe kennis werkelijk wordt begrepen.

App

Aki Härmä, Julie Bauer

27 november 2025

Neurodivergence at the University | Radboud Reflects Lecture by philosopher Léon de Bruin and student Juliana Waloschek

ADHD, autism, dyslexia, giftedness, and high sensitivity. Some brains work differently than others. How and when should a university provide extra support to neurodivergent students and staff? Neurodivergence can bring challenges, as well as unique talents. Are there limits to what a university can facilitate? Come listen to philosopher Léon de Bruin and student Juliana Waloschek and join the discussion about neurodivergence on campus. Neurodivergence at the University | Conversation with philosopher Léon de Bruin and student Juliana Waloschek | Thursday 27 November, 2025 | 12.30 – 13.15 hrs | Lecture Hall Complex, Radboud University | Radboud Reflects and Student Affairs DEI Read the review: www.ru.nl/en/services/sport-cu…nt-juliana-waloschek

Audio

Léon de Bruin, Juliana Waloschek

1 september 2025

Self-assessment C1 of CEFR

This is a checklist for speaking at the C1 level of the CEFR, adapted from the Companion Volume of the Common European Framework of Reference.

HboDocument

Council of Europe

1 september 2025

Responsible Anticipation and Visioneering

This exercise targets the development of students' capacities to critically analyze existing technological visions and enables them to create their own responsible socio-technical visions. Through group work and discussions, students examine technological promises embedded in anticipation discourses, uncover hidden values and assumptions, and develop alternative narratives that can guide engineering practice and policy decisions

Document

Martin Sand

21 augustus 2025

Collage-making for self-discovery in engineering ethics

This creative exercise enables students to discover, reflect and express their emotions in relation to engineering. In this way, the exercise enables self-understanding through an encounter with one’s own feelings and intuitions and serves as a starting point for better ethical deliberation and well-being. Learning goals: • Expanding moral sensibility (being aware of their own emotions, values and norms) • Stimulating moral creativity and imagination

Document

Aafke Fraaije

6 juni 2025

How To Write A Quantitative Research Paper

So, you need to write a ‘quantitative’ research paper, and you want to know: what is the correct way of writing such a paper? The answer is, unfortunately: it depends … For one, there is no universally accepted, ‘correct’ way of writing any paper in the social sciences in general. Moreover, even just within the so-called ‘quantitative’ research tradition specifically, there exist different viewpoints on what makes for a good research paper. To muddy things up even further, how to write a paper will also depend on the specific research question(s) that it addresses. Hence, even the same scientist might opt for varying approaches in different papers. Having said that, it is possible to identify some common rules and practices that are often followed, as well as a number of practices that should generally be avoided. Based on these common rules and practices, this document is meant to help you on your way with writing a ‘quantitative’ research paper by offering a number of tips, tricks and rules-of-thumb. None of these rules and practices are set in stone, and you (or your teacher/supervisor) may have excellent arguments to deviate from them. However, in general, following them will greatly increase the quality of your paper.

Document

Alex Lehr, Roderick Sluiter

2025

Prevalence and predictive values

In this e-learning module you will practice with the definitions of disease prevalence, sensitivity, specificity and the predictive value of different diagnostic tests through exercises. By the end of this module, you will know how disease prevalence and the measures sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value are interrelated.

Website

Cora Busstra, Lenie Rossem, van, Luc Heerkens