Ga naar de startpagina
Zoek leermateriaalKennis & expertiseCommunities
NL|EN
Privacy policyDeelnemende instellingen
Creative CommonsCreative Commons AttributionSURFFunded by the European Union

Filteren

Zoekresultaten (7)

HBO/WO

MBO

21 februari 2022

Ethical Cycle (Educational Format)

The ethical cycle is a helpful tool in structuring and improving moral decisions, especially in the context of teaching practical ethics. With improving moral decision-making we aim at a situation in which the decision-maker makes at least a systematic and thorough analysis of the moral problem and is able to justify his final decisions in moral terms. Ultimately, moral problem solving is directed at finding the morally best, or at least a morally acceptable, action in a given situation in which a moral problem arises. It is, however, hard to guarantee that the ethical cycle indeed delivers such a solution, if only because people may reasonably disagree about what is the morally best, or a morally acceptable, solution.

Document

L. Royakkers, Ibo van de Poel

5 juni 2022

Rana Plaza disaster and the problem of moral responsibility - Teacher version

This is an exercise that teaches students to discuss a case (the Rana Plaza building collapse in 2013) in terms of backward and forward-looking responsibility, and to make a stakeholder analysis of the actors involved and their values.

Document

Lavinia Marin

7 juni 2019

Business & the sustainable development goals

(RSM, 2018, 123 pag) . In dit boek presenteert Rob van Tulder een raamwerk voor ontwerpen vanbedrijfsstrategieën die effectief zijn voor duurzame ontwikkeling. Bevat daarnaast case studies van bedrijven die SDGs toepassen in hun strategie.

HboWebsite

Auteur onbekend

1 december 2021

Professional responsibility

The concept of professional responsibility is a component of ethics relevant in particular to how ethics relates to practical training. A sense of personal morality or the obligations one has to other roles can be distinguished from the responsibility someone has as a member of their profession. In this context we will focus on what the profession demands, independently from the degree to which all responsibilities may or may not be judged to align. This will allow a clearer view of exactly what it is that demanded by the workplace as opposed to other elements of one’s life.

Document

Miranda Nell

2 april 2020

Verpleegethiek PPT2: Ethisch pluralisme

Een vervolgpresentatie. Verschillende manieren van kijken naar een moreel ervaren probleem. o.a. het Trolleydilemma, gevolgen- en principe ethiek en zorgethiek. In een 2 uur durend (actief) college worden studenten uitgenodigd om verschillende perspectieven in te nemen en zij leren op andere en verschillende manieren kijken naar morele problemen.

HboPresentatie

Arjan van Os, Josje Witkamp

4 maart 2018

Responsible innovation: From MOOC to book

THIS IS THE FIRST EDITION, ONLY AVAILABLE ON REQUEST. PLEASE CONTACT Educationsupport - educationsupport-lib@tudelft.nl THE 2ND EDITION IS AVAILABLE HERE - https://textbooks.open.tudelft.nl/textbooks/catalog/book/24 Innovation may bring a lot of good to society, but innovation is not a good in itself. History provides many examples of innovations and new technologies that have had serious negative consequences, or that just failed to address significant problems and make meaningful contributions to society; recall for example carcinogenic asbestos or the ecological devastation of DDT. At the same time, we do need new technologies to find solutions for grand societal challenges such as energy scarcity, ageing demographics, water management and/or food security. So we are looking for responsible innovation in multiple upcoming fields that demand urgent attention in this regard: nanotechnology, biotechnology, artificial intelligence, policy-making based on big data analytics, and so on. Our goal then is to give you an in-depth knowledge of what responsible innovation entails - an ethical perspective to help shape socio-technical solutions for global and regional problems. This reader is intended to give a comprehensive but by no means exhaustive primer to responsible innovation. Responsible Innovation (abbreviated as RI henceforth) is a broad term that refers to the acts of analysis, reflection and public debate concerning the ethical principles and moral acceptability of new and emerging technologies. To do this, we must be able to answer key questions such as these: Do our efforts in applied science, technology and engineering contribute to the solution of the big problems of our age? How do we find solutions for global problems in a responsible way? Can technical solutions accommodate the plurality of moral values and the needs of all parties affected? The term “Responsible Innovation” itself was first introduced in 2006 in the context of the Dutch Research Council Program entitled Socially Responsible Innovations.: it is now incorporated into the larger Research and Development agenda of the European Union (EU). As recently as November 2014, the policy was endorsed and extended in the Rome Declaration on Responsible Research and Innovation. While thinking about RI has its roots in Europe, it is a concept with a true global reach. Consider that we live in a hyper-connected world: science provides knowledge of the fundamental building blocks and processes in Nature, our technologies scarcely leave any resource on the planet untouched. So, it is of the utmost importance, our duty even, to define an adequate and shared conception of responsibility for our innovations and technologies. Can our innovations save lives? Will they produce more jobs? Can they save the planet, or only contribute more waste and pollution? Are they safe for users and secure from abusers? Do they respect values and basic human rights we hold dear, like privacy, freedom, autonomy and equality? If not, how can we make them so? If not us, who? If not now, when?

Open (Access) Tekst Boek

Joost Groot Kormelink, Sofia Kaliarnta, N. Srivatsa

27 januari 2025

A value sensitive analysis of 13 cases in ICT ethics

The exercise proposes a step-by-step activity in which students will perform a value sensitive design analysis of 13 cases related to computer sciences/ ICT technologies. Students are asked to analyse a technology case in small groups. They are asked to identify the underlying value conflict that pertains to contrasting stakeholders’ views. Students do so through group work by selecting and working on one morally salient case study with an identifiable ethical problem (the exercise offers 13 such cases to pick from, but instructors are encouraged to add their own cases to this list). The students are encouraged to solve the value conflict by searching for already existing solutions proposed by different stakeholders (for example, designers, journalists, scholars, engineers, policy makers, etc.), and then analysing how a particular solution prioritizes certain values over others.

Document

Lavinia Marin, Samuela Marchiori, Joseph Emmanuel Sta. Maria, Dmitry Muravyov