Ga naar de startpagina
Zoek leermateriaalKennis & expertiseCommunities
NL|EN
Privacy policy
Creative CommonsCreative Commons AttributionSURFFunded by the European Union

Filteren

Zoekresultaten (47)

HBO/WO

MBO

17 juni 2026

AgriLemma 2.0: A serious game for exploring dilemmas in agriculture

In AgriLemma, you are a farmer in Europe managing your own farm across 8 seasons. You grow six types of crops — potatoes, sugar beets, rapeseed, corn, wheat, and chickpeas — each requiring resources such as seeds, water, nutrients, and workers. Players must run, invest in, and improve their farm with sustainable technologies while balancing competing priorities and navigating uncertainties like weather events and pest attacks. The objective is to maximize overall farm health, which is determined by three dimensions: environmental health (positive ecological impact), social health (worker satisfaction), and financial health (farm profitability). Players must strategize across all three dimensions simultaneously — decisions that boost profit may come at an environmental cost, and vice versa. The game makes these trade-offs tangible, encouraging reflection on what sustainable farming really requires. ------------------------------ Learning objectives: · Experiment with different strategies — to operationalize and adapt an approach under pressure, and to reflect on how well it held up. · Expose students to issues of risk management — to plan, control, and explain the reasoning behind in-game choices relating to sustainability, soil conservation practices, integrated crop management, weeding, and pest management, and to learn how to respond when conditions change. · Experience the complexity of decision-making — to take into account weather and policy uncertainties, sustainability pressures, economic realities, and the broader context in which farm decisions are made. --------------------------------Practical information: · Format: Board game (physical/ print-and-play) · Players: 2-4 players (extendable to 8 by playing in teams of 2) · Duration: 3 hours, including onboarding and debrief · Level: Higher education / Stakeholder engagement · Language: English --------------------------------Credits: AgriLemma was originally designed as part of the WATERAGRI project. The second version, including a full redesign of the graphics, was developed with funding support from the TU Delft Open Science Programme course "Civic Engagement in Action: Empowering Researchers and Educators to Make an Impact". Game design: Dr. ir. Aashna Mittal - TU Delft, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management Graphic design and illustration: Gracia Bovenberg-Murris and Michelle de Smit – TU Delft GameLab Note on image generation: The images in the tech cards and the border of the main game board were created using AI-generated imagery. The constructed wetlands card image is also AI-generated. All other cards and box art are hand-drawn or created in Adobe Illustrator. Note on usability: The print-and-play version of the game has been optimized for office printing.

Document

Aashna Mittal, Gracia Bovenberg-Murris, Michelle de Smit

5 november 2025

Grensoverschrijdend biologieonderwijs

Conform aan de rubric.

HboDocument

Auteur onbekend

1 januari 2025

Civinc: digitale tool voor gelijkwaardige dialoog

Hoe betrek je de studenten die nóóit hun hand opsteken wél bij het gesprek? En hoe laat je studenten veilig oefenen met uiteenlopende meningen, zonder escalatie? Civinc is een nieuwe, gratis (voor HBO & WO) dialoogtool waarmee je in een handomdraai al jouw studenten in een college of werkgroep in gesprek brengt over prangende thema’s: van Duurzaamheid tot Diversiteit & Inclusie, en van A.I. Ethiek tot Politiek. In <30 minuten wisselen 20 tot wel honderden studenten anoniem van gedachten met iemand die een ander perspectief heeft, om veilig te oefenen met verschillende meningen. Jij bepaalt zelf het thema en de stellingen voor het gesprek. Civinc werkt net zo makkelijk als Mentimeter of Kahoot, maar dit is de crux: alle studenten beantwoorden individueel prikkelende stellingen over het thema, en worden meteen gekoppeld aan een partner met een ander perspectief. In anonieme 1-op-1 chats wisselen zo tientallen/honderden koppels tegelijkertijd van mening. Op de inhoud, zonder bias, groepsdruk, sociale wenselijkheid. Gebruik de data-inzichten om het sentiment te begrijpen en na afloop met de groep te verdiepen, en je hebt een unieke dialoog te pakken! Bekijk de website of video voor meer uitleg over hoe Civinc werkt, en maak een gratis (voor HBO/WO) account aan om het te testen en er direct zelf mee aan de slag te gaan.

Website

Civinc

3 september 2024

Inzicht: Academische Vaardigheden voor Bouwkundigen, 2e editie

Het boek Academische Vaardigheden voor Bouwkundigen geeft een verdiepend beeld van bouwkunde als wetenschappelijke discipline, gaat expliciet in op de relatie tussen ontwerp en onderzoek en richt zich met name op praktische vaardigheden die bouwkundestudenten ontwikkelen gedurende hun bacheloropleiding in Delft. Het boek is opgebouwd uit vier delen. Deel A richt zich op de plaats van bouwkunde binnen de wetenschap. Deel B richt zich op basisvaardigheden: algemene academische vaardigheden voor bouwkundigen. Deel C diept specifieke bouwkundige methoden van onderzoek uit. Deel D, het laatste deel, is enerzijds gericht op de praktijk en anderzijds op reflectie. Door deze brede opzet kan het boek niet alleen direct gebruikt worden door studenten en docenten in de leerlijn Academische Vaardigheden, maar juist ook in de andere leerlijnen en modulen. Tevens is het boek een naslagwerk voor andere Bouwkunde- en Architectuuropleidingen in binnen- en buitenland dat inzicht geeft hoe wij binnen de faculteit Bouwkunde van de TU Delft aankijken tegen het vakgebied en welke academische vaardigheden daar op bachelorniveau bij horen.

Open (Access) Tekst Boek

MaartenJan Hoekstra, Louis Lousberg, Remon Rooij, Willemijn Wilms Floet, Sake Zijlstra

1 januari 2024

Roots Guide Educational Toolkit

Toolkit for facilitators and educators addressing themes like diversity, intersectionality, migration, heritage, identity, belonging, and inclusion in their courses and workshops. The toolkit features a 4-step process (Reflect, Connect, Explore & Share) that deploys interactive and creative methods like embodied mapping, storytelling, empathic listening, photography, and the development of history and heritage timelines. The Roots Guide educational toolkit was developed as part of the Roots Guide project (https://www.ourpocketstories.org/rootsguide), funded in part by the National Geographic Society and supported by Wageningen University & Research.

Wo, HboDocument

M.E. Ormond

27 september 2023

ICF-based Tools and Practices to promote the use of ICF

The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) is a linking framework for interprofessional collaboration and structuring the needs of a client. The need for practical training for professionals and the need for applications and tools to implement the ICF in clinical practice has been recognized. In total, 18 of the 20 planned development actions were completed. Four themes emerged: ICF training in the workplace (n=8), ICF videos (n=4), ICF tools (n=4), and ICF documentation (n=2). Bridging the gap between higher education and the work field was one of the ultimate objectives of the INPRO project. Much has been done, but it is clear that this work needs to continue in the future, in partnership with higher education institutions and working life. This report provides insight into how the developments were done and what the ICF-based tools and practices are.

Document

Jaana Paltamaa, L. Mutanen, E. van Lingen, Christine Haumer, Anita Kidritsch, Ingrid Aerts, Susanne Schulner-Weiss

14 september 2023

Publication strategies & Open Access: Watch out for predatory journals and publishers

Watch out for predatory journals and publishers Received an email lately encouraging you to publish with a new exciting sounding journal? Before you send your manuscript, take a few minutes to check up on that journal. It might be an invitation from a 'predatory journal'. Some tips to identify (potential predatory) journals and publishers When you want to check up on a journal - is it a predatory journal or not? -, take some time to look at its features. Tips to identify an Open Access option for your article. Related. Suggested.

Website

Erasmus University Library

14 september 2023

Publication strategies & Open Access: Choosing a journal to publish in

Choosing a journal to publish in Where will you publish your next journal article? With thousands of journals available it can be hard to find the right journal for your work. At the bottom of this page you can find an overview of tools that can help you create a 'shortlist' of journals to publish in. Some disciplines or research schools have developed journal lists, providing an overview of the journals most relevant to them. Aims & scope After creating a shortlist of suitable journals you need to check the aims and scope of the journals. Open Access options When choosing a journal the options to publish in Open Access can be important as well. All EUR-researchers are required to make their publications Open Access and most research funders have adopted policies that make Open Access publishing mandatory. AAbstracting and indexing information Where is the journal indexed? In other words: in which databases will researchers and students be able to find your article in their search results? Are these multidisciplinary databases, like Scopus or Web of Science, and/or discipline specific databases like EconLit, ERIC, PsycINFO or Sociological Abstracts? Are these databases you and your peers use? Tools to find journals to publish in Several tools have been developed to help you find suitable journals: these tools allow you to upload title, abstract and/or keywords of your article and – using data of articles already published - matching journals are shown. Some of these tools are publisher specific, others are publisher neutral. Journal lists Some disciplines and schools have created list of journals to publish in. These list are sometimes also used to evaluate researchers. Suggested.

Website

Erasmus University Library

12 september 2023

Who Nose? A workshop on smell and 21st Century Learning

Smell has long been part of education. Doctors for example would learn how to smell urine samples and diagnose based on the smell, sight and (yes) taste of the urine. A wine taster needs to learn how to tell the differences between types of wine and to describe the bouquet of the wine, and a perfume maker needs to train their ‘nose’ too. Histories of smell show the importance of odour in understanding issues of class, hygiene and sanitation. Smell has however been a more neglected sense in education and research more broadly, despite its strong links to emotion and memory. In these workshops, you will train your sense of smell and consider how sensing in a different way might help you to address the issues of your challenge owner and the challenge they pose. How might a sensitivity to smell help you address the challenge? How might you use smell to inform your investigation, and maybe even make it part of the intervention? How smell as a research tool and could inform investigation, specifically to think about how smell might be important: During the research phase (as a tool to take other people’s perspective, to come up with new questions for the Challenge Owner and other stakeholders involved); For analytical purposes to think through their challenges more conceptually; And also as a potential factor for the interventions that they will come up with further along their trajectory. Activities: Tutorial 1 Part I Introductions – in pairs, discuss a strong smell memory from “home” (whatever that means to you), and share this with the group Smell kit exercise – a commercial smell kit is passed around and we will describe the smells Anna will introduce some different research on smell, from interdisciplinary perspective, including her own research in medicine education as well as examples from other fields (e.g. marketing), as a way to lead discussion Part II We will then brainstorm what it might mean to make a smell kit relevant to your challenge owner and challenge. Each presents their challenge, while this student presents, the others jot down questions and smell impression on post-its and share afterwards. Encourage students to identify areas that they would appreciate feedback on. Then as a group they brainstorm together using the following questions as prompts: – What might attention to smell open up? – How might smell open up questions about the material things that they challenges are made of? – What kinds of smells would elicit some of these questions/solutions? – How might you go beyond discussion of how smell features in their projects to thinking critically about this together? – What are the histories of some of the smells (we can use tools in class such as the Odeuropa Smell Explorer to explore this: https://explorer.odeuropa.eu/) – How smell is relevant at different times in their project, or for different people? Between tutorials collect materials to bring to the next class to make a smell kit. These may be literal or representative connections to the challenge. Students are encouraged not only think about smell in a literal sense but how it connects to theory. Tutorial 2 – Making a smell kit* Part I We head out to the FASoS garden (weather permitting) and see if there are any more materials to collect. We walk in pairs, reflecting with each other on the materials we’ve brought to the session. We form as a group and share what we would put into our kits and why. Questions for each other. Anna will introduce some different interventions using smell, public health to museums, as a way to lead discussion on the possibilities of how smell might be used with their challenge owners. Part II Everyone assembles their kits. Make a small explanatory text accompanying the kit (form open to your creativity), explaining why the smells were chosen and how to use the kit. Group discussion on how the kit/smells may be brought into your group’s challenge. *students may also want to make a smell map instead, see https://sensorymaps.com/

Website

Anna Harris

1 september 2023

Measuring academic impact: An author-level metric: the H-index

An author-level metric: the h-index The H-index, proposed by physicist J.E. Hirsch (hence the H) in 2005, is a way to measure the individual academic output of a researcher. Which H-index? To create the list of publications and the number of citations received you can use different sources. Determining the H-index in Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar In these handouts you can find the steps to determine the H-index of a researcher in. Related. Support.

Website

Erasmus University Library