Ga naar de startpagina
Zoek leermateriaalKennis & expertiseCommunities
NL|EN
Privacy policyDeelnemende instellingen
Creative CommonsCreative Commons AttributionSURFFunded by the European Union

rubrics for open inquiry

Collectievan Supporting Students Scientific Open Inquiries in Labs

Filteren

HBO/WO

MBO

4 resultaten in “rubrics for open inquiry”of zoek in alle leermaterialen

1 september 2023

Rubrics minor Science, Technology & Innovation: Biomimicry

The rubric for the final report in the UvA's ST&I: Biomimicry minor is designed to assess students' ability to communicate their project findings effectively, integrating technical and scientific research with biomimicry principles. It emphasizes layout, scientific grounding, prototype development, testing accuracy, and comprehensive documentation, aiming to ensure clarity, depth, and professionalism in student reports. This detailed evaluation framework aligns with the program's interdisciplinary and innovative ethos, preparing students for real-world challenges while fostering academic rigor and creativity.

Document

Morten Stromme

2023

Maker Lab Open Inquiry: Presentation grading forms

Each of the Maker Lab's two Open Inquiry projects requires two graded presentations: a midway presentation by one of the two team members, and a final presentation by the other team member. These are submitted as pre-recorded videos. The midway videos are played during class, each followed by 10 minute live-Q&A sessions with peers and instructor(s). The final videos, on the other hand, are not played during class. Instead the presenter gives an abbreviated live version during class, followed by a 5-10 minute live-Q&A session with peers and instructor(s). Students are instructed to pitch the level of the talk at their peers (who have not done nor closely followed their inquiry). Students are further given these grading forms in advance to see on which assessment criteria their talk will be judged. Note: Simple "grading forms" are used instead of rubrics, with the difference being that performance levels are not individually described. I use grading forms instead of rubrics for several reasons: 1. I am the only grader for the course, thus inter-rater reliability is not an issue. 2. I include 10-12 specific assessment criteria which themselves help to communicate expectations, 3. The diverse student projects make it difficult to create meaningful level descriptors, and 4. I often leave explanatory remarks under the individual assessment criteria to explain my marks.

Document

Forrest Bradbury

2023

LU - PE3 - Course rubrics

Proposal is graded before the first session. Lab journal is graded after the final session and only if there is concern about the article). Article is graded after handing it in about 2 weeks after the final session.

Document

Paul Logman

2020

Rubrics Molecular Neurobiology

Here you can find the rubrics (assessment models) that are used to grade the different assignments of the course Molecular Neurobiology, year 3 Psychobiology, UvA. There are rubrics for the assessment of the presentations, practical skills, academic attitude, and the report. The different parts of the Rubric are assessed as follows: Exemplary: 10 out of 10 Advanced: 7 out of 10 Developing: 4 out of 10 Beginning: 1 out of 10 The different components have their own weightings. This has already been taken into account in the assessment of each component (for example, there are a maximum of 5 points to be earned for "exemplary" instead of 10 when a component is weighted at 0.5x).

Document

Simone Mesman