Go to homepage
Find educational resourcesKnowledge & expertiseCommunities
NL|EN
Privacy policyParticipating institutions
Creative CommonsCreative Commons AttributionSURFFunded by the European Union

Filter

Search results (7)

HBO/WO

MBO

October 20, 2023

The dual challenge from AI and cognitive science

This lecture offers a theoretical framework for analysing the ways in which insights about human and artificial cognition challenge existing legal (reasoning) practices. It briefly touches on possible pathways to address these challenges as well. The lecture is part of project RECOGNISE. RECOGNISE aims at developing an interdisciplinary training curriculum on legal reasoning and cognitive science, filling a gap in legal higher education. It is a strategic partnership of six European universities for higher education sponsored by the ERASMUS+ Programme. The project will provide the interested learners (legal researchers, law students, legal practitioners, and beyond) with introductory and advanced materials on topics including heuristics and biases in adjudication, cognitive structure of legal concepts, and defeasible reasoning in law. Materials will be provided in the form of an online handbook, video lectures, summer schools, and other online and on-campus activities.

Website

Antonia Waltermann

September 14, 2023

Publication strategies & Open Access: Choosing a journal to publish in

Choosing a journal to publish in Where will you publish your next journal article? With thousands of journals available it can be hard to find the right journal for your work. At the bottom of this page you can find an overview of tools that can help you create a 'shortlist' of journals to publish in. Some disciplines or research schools have developed journal lists, providing an overview of the journals most relevant to them. Aims & scope After creating a shortlist of suitable journals you need to check the aims and scope of the journals. Open Access options When choosing a journal the options to publish in Open Access can be important as well. All EUR-researchers are required to make their publications Open Access and most research funders have adopted policies that make Open Access publishing mandatory. AAbstracting and indexing information Where is the journal indexed? In other words: in which databases will researchers and students be able to find your article in their search results? Are these multidisciplinary databases, like Scopus or Web of Science, and/or discipline specific databases like EconLit, ERIC, PsycINFO or Sociological Abstracts? Are these databases you and your peers use? Tools to find journals to publish in Several tools have been developed to help you find suitable journals: these tools allow you to upload title, abstract and/or keywords of your article and – using data of articles already published - matching journals are shown. Some of these tools are publisher specific, others are publisher neutral. Journal lists Some disciplines and schools have created list of journals to publish in. These list are sometimes also used to evaluate researchers. Suggested.

Website

Erasmus University Library

August 23, 2023

Interactive session: Risk & Risk mitigation

Recognize, analyze and discuss the necessity and the role of security testing in AI. Employ documents, such as the AI Act, to classify use cases into risk categories. Discuss in-depth and with common European vocabulary on AI risk and how can AI be designed safely and benevolently, in ways that will not expose humans to unacceptable risks of harm, even when risky behaviour may advance a system goal. Classify the obligations of providers and users in relation to AI risk management. Discuss the requirements for high-risk AI systems as per the AI Act. Elaborate and recognize specific risks and risk taxonomies, relevant throughout the different stages of the AI lifecycle.

Website

HCAIM Consortium

2023

Critical Thinking in Legal Education (article & toolkit) - by Bart van Klink

Critical thinking is generally considered to be one of the central goals – if not the ultimate goal – of education. Critical thinking, as part of liberal learning, is done primarily for its own sake, for the sheer pleasure of thinking against the grain, exploring new ideas and thereby contributing to the development of scientific knowledge. The liberal conception of critical thinking is under threat, since education is nowadays turned into some form of social engagement. Increasingly, academic education is conceived in instrumental terms as a means to achieve some non-academic end: to create responsible ‘academic citizens’, who are committed to the values of diversity and inclusion and who are engaged in solving contemporary social problems. Against this tendency, this article defends a liberal conception of critical thinking in academic legal education and addresses three questions: (i) what is critical thinking? (ii) why do we need critical thinking? and (iii) how can we, as teachers, promote critical thinking in our students? Finally, it raises the question of whether a liberal conception of critical thinking rules out any kind of social engagement as pursued by universities in the present day.

Document

B.M.J. van Klink

December 1, 2022

Education of the Future

De UU ontwikkelt samen met de TU/e en WUR een synchrone en interdisciplinaire cursus over Sustainability Challenges (duurzaamheidsuitdagingen). Deze cursus bestaat uit wekelijkse online werkcolleges, een groepsproject en een digitaal examen. De werkcolleges zijn interactief en maken gebruik van de feedbackfaciliteiten van de Virtual Classroom, inclusief groepsfeedbacksessies en feedback van docenten en studenten via polls en chatfuncties. In het project wordt onderzocht hoe een online-cursus de intensiteit van interactie en feedback van een face-to-face cursus kan benaderen. Daarom wordt de online-cursus vergeleken met de bestaande face-to-face cursus. Het project analyseert onder meer de mogelijkheden voor interactie en feedback, de leeropbrengst en de tevredenheid van de docent en de student hierover. Omdat de cursus een sterk interdisciplinair karakter heeft, is een belangrijk thema hoe studenten uit verschillende achtergronden en -disciplines kunnen communiceren en samenwerken. De doelgroep bestaat allereerst uit studenten van de UU, TU/e en WUR, en in een latere fase staat de cursus ook open voor andere studenten. Het projectteam ontwikkelt een brede bachelorcursus over duurzaamheid. De doelgroep is daarmee erg groot. De huidige capaciteit is beperkt tot 36 studenten. Die kan in de toekomst worden uitgebreid, zowel door uitbreiding van het aantal schermen in de Virtual Classroom als door de ontwikkeling van een hybride klaslokaal. Het project levert de volgende resultaten op: Een interdisciplinaire online-cursus over duurzaamheid, waarbij gebruik wordt gemaakt van de Virtual Classroom van het UU Teaching & Learning Lab, inclusief verbeterde mogelijkheden voor interactie en feedback. De cursus wordt twee keer voor maximaal 36 studenten gegeven. Een in de praktijk getest protocol voor interuniversitaire samenwerking met de nadruk op thematisch, interdisciplinair leren en een focus op interactie en feedback. Een training voor universitaire docenten en pedagogisch personeel ontwikkeld ter ondersteuning van het ontwerp van succesvolle (interdisciplinaire) synchrone online-cursussen. De focus zal liggen op het gebruik van de Virtual Classroom en tools voor verbeterde interactie en feedback voor online-cursussen.

Document

Frans van Dam, Julia Kasch, Karin Rebel

September 1, 2022

Syllabus Political Epistemology (master course, PPE master)

This is a syllabus for the course Political Epistemology – Knowledge and in Markets and Democracy from the PPE master of Faculty of Philosophy of the University of Groningen. It contains the course structure and assigned readings for the 8 week course. The course summary reads as follows: We live in societies marked by the interplay of capitalist markets and democratic political structures. Both markets and democracies are mechanisms of social coordination in which the aggregation of knowledge plays an important role. But what is knowledge in the first place? Does it make sense to refer to notions of “truth” or “facts” in political contexts? And how does the use of knowledge work in different social spheres? While markets aggregate certain forms of knowledge through the price mechanism, democracies attempt to do so through deliberation and voting. What are the strengths and weaknesses of these mechanisms, and how well do they work for different forms of knowledge? What difference does it make that we live in a “digital age”? And last but not least: how do the ways in which societies deal with knowledge influence the delicate interplay between capitalism and democracy?

Document

Lisa Maria Herzog

2017

Responsible innovation: From MOOC to book

This textbook is based on the MOOC Responsible Innovation offered by the TU Delft. It provides a framework to reflect on the ethics and risks of new technologies. How can we make sure that innovations do justice to social and ethical values? How can we minimize (unknown)risks? The book explains: • The concept and importance of responsible innovation for society • Key ethical concepts and considerations to analyse the risks of new technologies • Different types of innovation (e.g. radical, niche, incremental, frugal) • Roadmap for Responsible Innovation by Industry • The concept of Value Sensitive Design (VSD) It includes a link to all the web lectures as well as case studies ranging from care robots and nuclear energy to Artificial Intelligence and self-driving vehicles.

Document

Joost Groot Kormelink