Go to homepage
Find educational resourcesKnowledge & expertiseCommunities
NL|EN
Privacy policyParticipating institutions
Creative CommonsCreative Commons AttributionSURFFunded by the European Union

Filter

Search results (6)

HBO/WO

MBO

August 23, 2023

Practical: Apply auditing frameworks

Gain practical skills how to audit the robustness of machine learning models How to implement evasion (adversarial examples) and poisoning/backdoor attacks Evaluate the model degradation due to these attacks

Website

HCAIM Consortium

August 23, 2023

Practical: Enhancing ML security and robustness

Gain practical skills to mitigate integrity problems of machine learning Design robust machine learning models Mitigate evasion (adversarial examples) Mitigate backdoors (poisoning) Evaluate the trade-off between robustness and model accuracy

Website

HCAIM Consortium

August 23, 2023

Lecture: Security and robustness

Gain a general overview of the main security problems of machine learning Understanding the main confidentiality, integrity, and availability issues of machine learning Distinguishing evasion, poisoning and backdoors attacks Understanding clean-label poisoning attacks Obtain the the intuition of adversarial examples and its practical impact through real-life examples Demonstrating the availability attacks by artificially constructed sponge examples Understanding the threat of explainability evasion Understanding the trade-off between robustness and model quality Learn the principles of AI (robustness) auditing

Website

HCAIM Consortium

May 11, 2020

Apple vs. FBI – the encrypted phone (Student handout)

At the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, California a major terrorist attack happened at December 2nd 2015. A husband and wife opened fire on a mass and attempted bombing. According to the FBI, both suspects practiced Islam and had been “radicalized”. FBI declared the incident a terrorist attack. The investigators saw an opportunity to collect evidence against the perpetrators and to identify their network: one of the suspects was employed by the government, which was therefore in possession of the suspect’s iPhone 5C. The phone was encrypted but FBI assumed that valuable data would be found inside it which would help them identify other terrorist suspects and their future attacks.

Document

Udo Pesch, Verena Schrama

May 11, 2020

Apple vs. FBI – the encrypted phone (Teacher version)

At the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, California a major terrorist attack happened at December 2nd 2015. A husband and wife opened fire on a mass and attempted bombing. According to the FBI, both suspects practiced Islam and had been “radicalized”. FBI declared the incident a terrorist attack. The investigators saw an opportunity to collect evidence against the perpetrators and to identify their network: one of the suspects was employed by the government, which was therefore in possession of the suspect’s iPhone 5C. The phone was encrypted but FBI assumed that valuable data would be found inside it which would help them identify other terrorist suspects and their future attacks.

Document

Udo Pesch

May 11, 2020

Apple vs. FBI – the encrypted phone (student take-home assignment)

At the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, California a major terrorist attack happened at December 2nd 2015. A husband and wife opened fire on a mass and attempted bombing. According to the FBI, both suspects practiced Islam and had been “radicalized”. FBI declared the incident a terrorist attack. The investigators saw an opportunity to collect evidence against the perpetrators and to identify their network: one of the suspects was employed by the government, which was therefore in possession of the suspect’s iPhone 5C. The phone was encrypted but FBI assumed that valuable data would be found inside it which would help them identify other terrorist suspects and their future attacks.

Document

Udo Pesch