Ga naar de startpagina
Zoek leermateriaalKennis & expertiseCommunities
NL|EN
Privacy policyDeelnemende instellingen
Creative CommonsCreative Commons AttributionSURFFunded by the European Union

Filteren

Zoekresultaten (12)

HBO/WO

MBO

21 oktober 2026

Conclusion

The conclusion highlights the value of reuse and adaptation as approaches to rethinking existing resources and creating new possibilities. It emphasises the importance of understanding the potential of what already exists and exploring how it can be transformed, reinterpreted and applied in new contexts. Reuse and adaptation provide opportunities to connect past and present, preserve existing value and encourage creative and sustainable approaches to change.

Open (Access) Tekst Boek

Marta Bustillo, Paola Corti, Claudia Hackl- Mayerhofer, Harrie van der Meer, Sylvia Moes

1 juni 2021

Unit 8: Introductions and conclusions, paraphrasing, writing forum

Videos: Video 17: Introducing and concluding your essay Homework task(s): Write out the body of your essay Suggested tasks for the tutorial: Exercise on introductions and conclusions (using a sample essay, otherwise a case study text) 1. Find the introduction and conclusion. 2. Highlight/annotate the following elements: • Introduction a) Establishing the field b) Research gap c) Thesis statement • Conclusion a) Restatement of thesis b) Summary of argumentation c) Ideas for future research Are any elements missing? Is there anything extra that is not on this list? Exercise on paraphrasing Using one of your case study articles: 1. Find a place in the text where a journal article is referenced, but not directly quoted. 2. Go to the Reference list and track down the original journal article using the library catalogue. 3. Open the original article. • Do you think the author of the case study article has paraphrased a specific section of this source, or have they summarised the source? • If you think the source was paraphrased, can you find the section that was paraphrased? Peer review exercise on integrating sources Swap essay drafts with a partner. Make notes on the following questions: 1. Has your partner used direct quotations? • If so, are they properly integrated (not 'floating?) 2. Has your partner used paraphrases? • If possible, open the original source text. How similar is the paraphrase to the source text? 3. Are all quotations and paraphrases adequately cited? Prepare written feedback for your partner. If time, share and discuss your feedback together.

Document

Philomeen Dol, Elly Dutton, Bryan O'Donovan, Gea Hakker

8 mei 2018

05-02: Evaluating causal claims - micro lecture THE VALIDITY OF CAUSAL RESEARCH

In this micro lecture the following items will be explained regarding this lecture: Four types of validity in the context of causal inference: statistical conclusion validity internal validity measurement and sampling validity external validity

Website

Henk van der Kolk

8 mei 2018

03-11: Theory - micro lecture THE VALIDITY OF CAUSAL RESEARCH

In this micro lecture the following items will be explained regarding this lecture: Four types of validity in the context of causal inference: statistical conclusion validity internal validity measurement and sampling validity external validity

Website

Henk van der Kolk

8 mei 2018

07-21: Measurement - micro lecture THE VALIDITY OF CAUSAL RESEARCH

In this micro lecture the following items will be explained regarding this lecture: Four types of validity in the context of causal inference: Statistical conclusion validity Internal validity Measurement and sampling validity External validity

Website

Henk van der Kolk

8 mei 2018

01-10: Research question - micro lecture THE VALIDITY OF CAUSAL RESEARCH

In this micro lecture the following items will be explained regarding this lecture: Four types of validiy in the context of causal inference: statistical conclusion validity internal validity measurement and sampling validity external validity

Website

Henk van der Kolk

8 mei 2018

04-03: Research designs - micro lecture OBSERVATION

In this micro lecture the following items will be explained regarding this lecture: Introducing various types of observation, including: naturalistic and contrived observation participant and non-participant observation types of sampling in systematic observation conclusion observation schedules

Website

Henk van der Kolk

9 februari 2023

The Rest Is History | 303. The Bloodiest Crusade (Part 3)

Thought by some as the first genocide in Europe, the Albigensian Crusade was the bloodiest crusade in history. Following the Mystery of the Cathars and the Real Da Vinci Code, Tom and Dominic come to the conclusion of their series on the Cathars with an extraordinary and bloody tale of ideological tyranny. Producer: Theo Young-Smith Executive Producers: Jack Davenport + Tony Pastor

Audio

Tom Holland, Dominic Sandbrook, Theo Young-Smith, Jack Davenport, Tony Pastor

16 juli 2020

Byzantium & Friends | 28. How we choose our research topics, with Tia Kolbaba Thursday Jul 16, 2020

A conversation with Tia Kolbaba (Rutgers University) about how we decide what questions need to be studied, how we identify blind-spots and misconceptions, reframe a problem, and navigate the shallows and the deep in order to bring a project to conclusion. Are there politics within a field that shape these decisions, sensitive areas that we need to avoid, or responsibilities toward non-academic communities?

Audio

Anthony Kaldellis, Tia Kolbaba

23 augustus 2023

Lecture: Conducting a literature review

Define what a literature review is and explain its role in scientific research. Understand the process behind conducting an effective literature review. Describe the essential components of a literature review, including introduction, body, and conclusion. Differentiate between different types of literature reviews (e.g., systematic, narrative, scoping) and their respective structures. Understand the principles of academic integrity, plagiarism, and proper citation. Understand the importance of applying principles of effective scientific writing, including clarity, conciseness, and precision.

Website

HCAIM Consortium